I do not understand what you really want. So the answer to the letter of the question he asked.
Yes, in most known to me of license agreements the word "software" in Russian is passed as "software" means all supply work as a whole in the diversity of its components: the actual computer program, the graphical user interface elements, audio-visual parts, documentation and other texts in natural languages, the illustrations to them.
That does not negate the fact that it may be otherwise — it is necessary to read the contract.
If you are confused by the word "software" in relation to the text in human language, we first note that in the English original of the word, and not at all — the so-called "soft" (soft) products (wares) is all that is opposed to "solid" (hard) "products", that is, the equipment ("hardware").
And secondly, nothing in it and no — legalis differs from everyday language, which introduces all sorts of counterintuitive terms, and then strictly adhere to them. In the same copyleft license GNU object known contract not named "software" and "program" or "library", that is, a set of icons "Advaita" according to its license is a "library", and nothing.
But there is more.
I think through your question betrays a confidence, that if the owners of the non-free something you forgot to deny you that?
For pity's sake! The whole point of the copyright monopoly is that you *and* everything is forbidden, but to use the work on purpose for their own purposes (roughly: read a book, listen to music, the program to execute). And the license is so called "license" that it is a permissive document, always return to you any rights over these.