Asterisk: centos or freebsd?

As it would be better and more beautiful?
July 8th 19 at 11:30
6 answers
July 8th 19 at 11:32
Ubuntu Server
why? - nona33 commented on July 8th 19 at 11:35
: easy to put all necessary dependencies - Maida53 commented on July 8th 19 at 11:38
: Ububtu supports more advanced iron than CentOs. Under FreeBSD there is no DAHDI drivers for Asterisk. - Kenyatta commented on July 8th 19 at 11:41
: understood - nona33 commented on July 8th 19 at 11:44
July 8th 19 at 11:34
why reinvent velospeed?
if you are comfortable on BSD we can use that I know on and deploy on centos easier troubleshootить
July 8th 19 at 11:36
To the above: if you only need a Aster, and there is no rejection to the GUI, it is easier native distrib to deliver.
July 8th 19 at 11:38
It here and there works fine. Choose a system you know best.
July 8th 19 at 11:40
There were some unexplained problems with Asterisk on FreeBSD 13 10.3 (for example, failed to work PJSIP). Had to evict it on CentOS. I will not say that FreeBSD is to blame - the living conditions of the Asterisk were harsh in Gale.
Old Asterisk 1.8 is fine on FreeBSD.
July 8th 19 at 11:42
Agree with . Although the old memory adminstva FreeBSD may notice that drivers on the Board is very small. It concerns of course mainly boards FXS/FXO, E1 Board, but also can not be got - before buying you need very carefully to find out presence of fire wood under FreeBSD. Guaranteed to work only cards from Digium and compatible cards (those that pretend to Digium)

Find more questions by tags AsteriskFreeBSDSIPCentOS