The most preferred option 3, since in this case it is assumed that each element will have a class that meets almost all of the major methodologies, and dearly loved me SMACSS.
The performance of the cascade is affected directly, because, firstly, increasing the size of the css file blocking the rendering, and second, the reading of the selectors and the search in the tree right to left, i.e. in the embodiment 1 will first find all references and images, and then collected heap violents ones that are in the hat. But ideally, of course, will be something like this:
.logo {
background-color: #ccc;
}
.logo-link {
color: #000;
text-decoration: none;
}
.logo-img {
display: block;
width: 100%;
}
No cascade (the size of the output css is minimized), the loss of productivity in the sample is also minimized.
If the person paying for the 50$ , respectively, then it is 50$ gets.
When you come to the store to buy a kilo of oranges, you get a kilo of oranges, but not as much as you need so you can become orange.
Now everyone wants everything for free....and without the desire to spend money on it.
You cite the example of Amazon, which where every second million dollars...
but you did not provide the amount of how much Amazon spends on developing / supporting, etc.
To reduce their costs of such are used..
Even though you yourself think what you're saying, and then write about how to live. - Jillian_Goodw commented on July 8th 19 at 16:11