The network provider is antifolate passes only by using their mac addresses, is there a law when which it violates the law?

My ISP does not use the tools to implement secure access to the network, is it possible to punish him for it? In particular, does not use encryption and tunneling network is like a huge LAN network where security and can not be considered. I changed my physical address to the one that was given a scanner and can access the network even if your balance is insufficient.
July 9th 19 at 10:13
5 answers
July 9th 19 at 10:15
Solution
Here you can catch just because the provider is, in fact, unable to establish the identity of connected callers. ie if you connect a wifi access point somewhere on neutral territory (attic for example) to the equipment of the provider, and give free Wi-Fi, it's a violation of the law.
But this is true only in case if Russia providers are obliged to collect data on all subscribers. In any case I think this way you can dig.
By the way if You do that and get someone's MAC address, keep in mind that most likely fills up on them...

And stop already to feed this Troll))
July 9th 19 at 10:17
Solution
Write to Roskomnadzor, the CPS, and so on...
July 9th 19 at 10:19
Let's look at another option. Have a smart-ass user. Who is looking for a freebie. Who decided to borrow someone else's traffic. And his ass fried. And he started running like a hen in a henhouse. which is not enough cock. To tell something about what he thought about what he was thinking about what it would be good if he's so smart .... and so on to infinity. Well, in fact ... have a thief. Caught him by the hand and he now carries all sorts of bunk.

088a7d745adb4b7e999584ed9285a649.jpg

The provider has not violated any laws. And you broke. =) Well, then the court will understand. So

681d011854124b30a520c014f68ef993.jpgf6f88e5e710d4217a3008244118b7a9f.jpg
July 9th 19 at 10:21
So go away to another provider if this is not satisfied.
Other providers not in the house, only adsl. Not an option - chanelle30 commented on July 9th 19 at 10:24
ADSL, by the way, also does not imply encryption. And no idea which provider would be to encrypt the subscriber traffic... - Mikayla.Roh commented on July 9th 19 at 10:27
: traffic through the pppoe connection is encrypted? - chanelle30 commented on July 9th 19 at 10:30
No. What's the point? And Yes, ADSL is PPPoE not necessarily, nothing prevents to do IPoE ADSL. - Mikayla.Roh commented on July 9th 19 at 10:33
: well, it is not encrypted, all encrypted, it's turret through Ethernet. It turns out a secure connection between a client and a server provider. - chanelle30 commented on July 9th 19 at 10:36
No. It's really a tunnel, but inside nothing is encrypted. You can take a sniffer to listen to traffic and verify this personally.
Technology PPPoE does not imply encryption (Google for" packet format PPPoE")
The data inside the PPPoE tunnel will be encrypted only if using PPPoE tunnel someone will transfer the ALREADY encrypted data) and nothing else.

OK. For example, the provider (not clear why) uses some kind of encryption of subscriber traffic and which? Traffic is encrypted only within the provider network then after he has not yet its limits he can not be encrypted, raze. Otherwise, how devices outside the network provider will realize that traffic to do it also encrypted?
That is, if traffic will be encrypted and the border of the provider on at all. - Mikayla.Roh commented on July 9th 19 at 10:39
July 9th 19 at 10:23
In my country - are not violated.
At the same time such providers, we have a bound on the MAC is accompanied by a reference to the port switch and change the Mac on nassaney will only alert the admin, and then you have to explain. A physical connection to someone else's subscriber cable this is the article.
In your case, there is a binding port/mac address in my no. Are you from Russia? - chanelle30 commented on July 9th 19 at 10:26
: Excuse me, how do You know that it is not? You the configs of the switch looked? Or already tried to change the maquis? - Mikayla.Roh commented on July 9th 19 at 10:29
: if you say no, mean no. When you change to a random Mac, dhcp gives me ip there and there is a cap from the ISP comes out - chanelle30 commented on July 9th 19 at 10:32
: and when I was a neighbor of the Mac, your he's sitting at home, when his net unpaid, he has fast access to the network appears. Do you think there binding? - Mikayla.Roh commented on July 9th 19 at 10:35
: do you when the connection has not signed a Contract and have you not broken the terms? - chanelle30 commented on July 9th 19 at 10:38

Find more questions by tags Jurisprudence in ITInformation security