Is (custom development), which need to modify, so, since we have no developers are going to do a contest.
In tender documents it is necessary to prescribe how the evaluation will assess the bidder's qualification. Company with state participation, and means by 223-FZ does not go through.
- To give a piece of code for code review, to report and to evaluate, to communicate with the team Member will not work - evaluation criteria specific, subjective, there may be a complaint to the FAS.
- To request copies of the documents confirming qualification - you know how these documents are done in 1 day if necessary.
- To say, "optimize your code" - to a complaint to the FAS with the words: "Why is my optimization, the worst of it?", and so on,
Any thoughts, colleagues? All criteria must be clearly defined in the tender documentation.
While in his mind only one thing: to make deliberate errors in the code, including the critical (which will work) and ask them to fix it. Look at the commented code and fixed and evaluated only on the count of found and fixed errors.