Core i7 vs Core 2 Duo?

I want to change the laptop. Stayed for HP EliteBook 8560p (LY441EA):
h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/me/en/sm/WF06b/321957-3219...


The only question is: not enough to date two cores (whether this notebook faster old).


In the old Core 2 Duo T6500 (2M Cache, 2.10 GHz, 800 MHz FSB):
ark.intel.com/products/39311/


The new Core i7-2640M Processor (4M Cache, 2.80 GHz):
ark.intel.com/products/53464


Will be a noticeable difference in performance? Or the flea?
October 8th 19 at 00:26
13 answers
October 8th 19 at 00:28
Solution
Well firstly www.notebookcheck-ru.com/Reiting-mobilnykh-processorov-sravnenie-proizvoditelnosti.14099.0.html

Second, most of the inhibits in the system screw. Then from the task can slow down graphics. Again solves the memory.

It all depends on what you need the laptop. Based on the fact that it's faster to compile, the difference in speed I would say is not very big, but to pinch the video, then there is the difference.
October 8th 19 at 00:30
I believe to change the hardware more often than every 3-5 years is the indulgence consumer instincts and paying tribute to the transnational corporations. In General, is a bad idea.
A Core2Duo is a lovely processor. - antonette.Gislas commented on October 8th 19 at 00:33
the laptop on core2duo started to do in 2007, so five years have passed. - Selena_Rath99 commented on October 8th 19 at 00:36
The current laptop I use it for 3 years:
market.yandex.ru/model.xml?modelid=4858244&hid=91013&show-uid=741150613341303127

First and foremost, not satisfied with the quality of the screen (horrible colors) and screen resolution (only 768px height). - Tyshawn11 commented on October 8th 19 at 00:39
October 8th 19 at 00:32
Say, on the visual performance much noticeable effect replacing the HDD to SSD, rather than a replacement C2D to i7.
I agree. Let the author then buys or ssd to your current laptop, or buy a new one immediately with a pre-installed ssd. Indeed, the performance increase on the ssd will be very noticeable. In terms of the system. If the course needed is the computational power of the i7 itself will be much better than c2d - antonette.Gislas commented on October 8th 19 at 00:35
Acceleration from SSD almost imperceptibly if not initially used flawed techniques, like off beech instead of slumber. - Selena_Rath99 commented on October 8th 19 at 00:38
strange, but somehow, I have a full on night vyklyuchaetsya seven and 2008r2 ssd all off the same 3-5 seconds before entering a password, plus a couple of seconds, unbeknownst to me, loaded all sorts of Skype, outlooki, ICQ and gtalk, but they are loaded in the background I have time to open the browser with gmeyl/FB/Twi/VK/MSN and don't see any brakes. Yes, c2d/2gb ram. - Tyshawn11 commented on October 8th 19 at 00:41
October 8th 19 at 00:34
Mobile ci7 features from the c2d in the first place less power consumption. And in the laptop it is much more important than anything else.

And performance any good table stone five years ago will beat any laptop with a large margin.
Any good desktop graphics card from five years ago will beat any mobile in all respects.
Any good monitor all the same it is more pleasant to the eye than any laptop.
And any normal keyboard is anyway more convenient. And for maniacs there is even a small keyboard with tachpadom.
And while it all cooks hands, not humming turbine and not zastavlyaet or to keep your hands above your head or slouch when referring to buttons.

Laptops are not for high performance do and not for games and not to watch a movie and not for convenience.
And to be able to take and carry.
In my opinion, all your statements are wrong.

PS: Liked the phrase "any good". :) - antonette.Gislas commented on October 8th 19 at 00:37
Give an example to refute or to accept the inadequacy of your look. - Selena_Rath99 commented on October 8th 19 at 00:40
Exactly what to take and carry away. And carry along with all programs and files. Accordingly, the fixed have to work on the laptop. Yes, you can connect an external monitor. But the external processor will not connect. - Tyshawn11 commented on October 8th 19 at 00:43
And performance any good table stone five years ago will beat any laptop with a large margin.

Dual-core Intel i5 2410M in a laptop does at times Q6600 desktop Quad-core.
Any good monitor all the same it is more pleasant to the eye than any laptop.

I have a laptop ips matrix.
And any normal keyboard is anyway more convenient. And for maniacs there is even a small keyboard with tachpadom.

The thinkpad keyboard saw nothing.
And while it all cooks hands, not humming turbine and not zastavlyaet or to keep your hands above your head or slouch when referring to buttons.

The laptop almost never turns cooler, usually only hear the hard drive. - Eulah.Steub commented on October 8th 19 at 00:46
I'm not comparing bad desktops and good laptops, I compare good desktops.
> Dual-core Intel i5 2410M in a laptop does at times Q6600 desktop Quad-core.
Incorrect comparison. the q6600 is already more than six years. Will do if he q9650? I doubt it.
> I have a laptop ips matrix.
And I have a 30" 2560x1600 s-ips matrix.
> The thinkpad keyboard saw nothing.
Should be very comfortable the inability to move the keyboard from the screen within ten centimeters?

Compare adequate iron, not the bad.
Adequate would be to compare the same price of the equipment. Not a new laptop for two thousand dollars with a computer of five years ago, which then cost six hundred, and today he's a hundred rubles.

Hint, much sympathy. - bernadine.Polli commented on October 8th 19 at 00:49
Chii, all your arguments negates the fact that with a laptop you can cozy up on the couch, on the floor, or anywhere but on a computer only to work, sitting at a table in a simple pose.

And with that, the notebook is easy to connect the keyboard and monitor. - Isaias.Ki commented on October 8th 19 at 00:52
hmm. mine I have a friend sitting on the couch with mouse radio/radio Claudia and hanging it on a wall 90cm TV and having vented the storage system unit, the total cost without screws now somewhere 13 kilobaksov, is something that is not so :). esloi that first line about the sofa and TV 90cm ) - Adeline95 commented on October 8th 19 at 00:55
In fact, the thinkpad keyboard is not just for laptops, it is also usual usbшная keyboard, even the TrackPoint is. View on ebee. - Jacinto_Oberbrunn commented on October 8th 19 at 00:58
October 8th 19 at 00:36
The MC today is not very important. Here 4M cache is good.

In General, as you know "the System works with the speed of the slowest element" so to compare the two systems only on the percent that's rude.
October 8th 19 at 00:38
The biggest jump in performance since the first Core Duo, felt when moving from HDD to SSD, not when you change the CPU. Now, working with HDD system occurs about the same weird nostalgic feeling of discomfort, as when using a CRT monitor. PHPStorm, Eclipse, two working new path: Win and CentOS with two DBMS — feel on Core2Duo 1.86 GHz + SSD is absolutely free, so find no reason to change the stone. My opinion: try to start to change the screw.
October 8th 19 at 00:40
as the user HP EliteBook 8560w (XU085UT) I can say that the powerful percents without the SSD for compilation of little help. But SSD wonderfully large speeds up build times so 3-4.
If amazing, the SSD works very quickly with lots of small files, there is no loss in the track search, sector, unlike HDD) - antonette.Gislas commented on October 8th 19 at 00:43
Unfortunately, the model number 8560p only have the option of SSD at 128 GB, which is very small. So take with HDD 500 GB (SSD can be put independently over time). - Selena_Rath99 commented on October 8th 19 at 00:46
My similar problem was solved external vitiny screw (MyBookPro). - Tyshawn11 commented on October 8th 19 at 00:49
October 8th 19 at 00:42
the difference will be very strong. But I would advise to take the Quad.
October 8th 19 at 00:44
For heavy tasks, the difference will be very noticeable. Will leave it here just for information:
My mobile i3-2310 2.13 zГГц test run 10-15% faster than my desktop Core 2 Duo E8200 2.66 GHz.
October 8th 19 at 00:46
www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core2+Duo+T6500+%40+2.10 GHz vs www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i7-2640M+%40+2.80 GHz — if money to upgrade there is, IMHO no need to think. There SSD, more memory, and will for several more years good :)
October 8th 19 at 00:48
You know, I had a laptop with a Core 2 Duo T6500 and when starting Windows, yet Skype will not start, it was very difficult to do something, I changed to core i5 and it is heaven and earth. Although it is said that megahertz is not important, but the difference is not in megahertz, and not in the amount of yared. The difference will be the processor architecture, the instruction set and so on. i7 better than core 2 duo because of the novelty and change, even the frequency is not higher and not more cores.
The flea is not, in any case, on the other hand, the first answer is very correct, if the screw is worse then no percent will not help, even one hundred nuclear, it will load very slowly, and to work very fast and the difference is not noticeable.
Boot time? Standby what's wrong? - antonette.Gislas commented on October 8th 19 at 00:51
October 8th 19 at 00:50
In i7 have HT is not a useless thing in a battle of the processors.
Well, ssd + lots of RAM solves. I am now 8 sit, all the brakes from over the network.
October 8th 19 at 00:52
I have two laptops
1. Asus A6M — taxiing to ESXi server, etc. Pribluda.
2. Motion Computing LE 1600 — network testing and drawing of buns for the bosses (for planning meetings).

They both share one extra battery DasVision BP-600 — if not close the socket.

All this has use since 2008 and never thought about replacing.

Find more questions by tags IntelProcessors