Answering old unanswered questions in QA?

Does it make sense to meet in the old QA-topics that are unanswered?

(the last "unanswered" by the way, is dated 2nd September 2010)

Or answers to these topics will be necroposted?


UPD Habrahabr QA: some statistics and alternative ...
October 8th 19 at 02:31
6 answers
October 8th 19 at 02:33
Reply. Even if the author does not use it for other readers it may be useful, including those who naguglit this question.
If Habr showed how many people signed up on answers. You can really judge the relevance of the answer by the number added to your favorites. - jordyn_Crem commented on October 8th 19 at 02:36
Thank you, the amount of green to this kammenty speaks for Habr best. - selmer_Beatty commented on October 8th 19 at 02:39
October 8th 19 at 02:35
I'll answer this question in a year
October 8th 19 at 02:37
Reply. QA is very well indexed by search engines, many people will be able to find answers to your questions:)
October 8th 19 at 02:39
I think that reply makes sense, if there is no solution, that is, the question is not marked as solved.
A lot of friends does not mark the topic as solved, even if I found a solution. - jordyn_Crem commented on October 8th 19 at 02:42
October 8th 19 at 02:41
I do believe good form, to answer your question if a solution was found independently. It could be useful to someone else.
I am glad that you are one of those who "have figured out Myself, the moderators close the topic." - jordyn_Crem commented on October 8th 19 at 02:44
October 8th 19 at 02:43
Write a script that will pass on such issues and ask the author a PM. So to choose )

Find more questions by tags Other