Control panel virtualname

Advise what the socket is good.

What is available now.
Single server: Debian Squeeze + Xen 4.0.1 and the path on it.
Is the whole thing from one provider. Provider presses the IPS, so NAT and port forwarding.
To automate the creation of virtuallock boiled DHCP.
Configuration files of virtuallock eat a special option for port forwarding.
(Cut through half of the manifold on the shell and a few Python scripts. :) Who should can diffame to share.)
IPS to every machine from the subnet 192.168.x.1, vif'Ah of the host machine 192.168.x.254. Between virtualname the network.

What you want.
Something that can be integrated into existing infrastructure, with the subsequent extension.
Now I want to automatically create a new path with a different OS in a single click. Chose Arch clicked and 5 minutes later logged into it via SSH. Chose FreeBSD, clicked, after 5 minutes came in via VNC and drove her in the PV.
Also convenient dashboards what to have shown that there is at the moment, there is some axle stands and CPU usage, RAM what.
In subsequent can be another server, and ACC. want migration from this panel to have.
It would be very cool if on the second server it would be possible to do KVM and to manage the entire system and Xen and KVM from a single panel.

I was confused in the choice, too much has been written of all. OpenNebula like anything, but again, there are plenty of decisions any. OpenStack XenOrchestra, ConVirt 2.0, oVirt, OpenECP, Enomaly. What would you recommend? And most importantly worried that my network configuration working. And so you can reconfigure if IPS will appear on all breeches. And please note that I have a simple Xen, not XCP. XCP already set there is no possibility, and desires too, probably.
October 10th 19 at 04:08
4 answers
October 10th 19 at 04:10
Not so long ago came, not yet had time to investigate. View:
Wah! It's just having sold all my dreams! Thank you! - Lolita_Gerho commented on October 10th 19 at 04:13
Thank you and see. - Lola56 commented on October 10th 19 at 04:16 - Nasir.Dooley commented on October 10th 19 at 04:19
Alas, they haven't done support for LVM, now the active version 0.6 beta, LVM promise only 1.0 - Noemie18 commented on October 10th 19 at 04:22
Actually there quite a while already hanging beta6. I have the feeling that the developers have been busy. Generally there is one primary maintainer and apparently he's really busy with something else. And so the product is interesting, beautiful but tough. If someone will try, even suggest to take the latest nightly build. Tried this stuff on a small production, as an additional interface. You can live, if you adapt. Periodically bugs out some, but then you more or less know the limitations of the product. That how and why. - Lola56 commented on October 10th 19 at 04:25
October 10th 19 at 04:12 really doesn't control Xena, but if it does not put at the forefront.
Thank you. No, Xen is important. Without Xen in any way. :) - Lolita_Gerho commented on October 10th 19 at 04:15
October 10th 19 at 04:14
intelligence: Archipel is very pleased. Thank you for such a discovery. Treasure just unearthed. :) I will try. Since XMPP is also an interesting idea. Do not undertake to say it is bad or good, but interesting. That's what it means to think outside the box. :) I only wish ejabberd supported.
Put — I will unsubscribe, what and how. Maybe I even post enough. However, karma trouble. :) Well, it would be a good post, and karma, or people with karma, ready to post there. :) But honestly shit harakara this your all. Information must be free! Without anal karmarsch. :)) - Lolita_Gerho commented on October 10th 19 at 04:17
October 10th 19 at 04:16 — good list, but inclined also to the "Archipel".
If our guys (Russian) bring to mind your and release a stand-alone — might be a good product.

Find more questions by tags VirtualizationXen