How to deal with the re-optimized text?

After reading a book about text editing, tried his hand as editor.
Ordered an article on a legal topic, on the stock exchange of copywriters wrote an article with 90% uniqueness, still the subject of legal articles of the law on another call.

Has set for itself the task:
- remove from the article text, which is not useful to the reader
to simplify the understanding of the text is to describe in simple language
- add examples
to analyze particular cases - frequently asked questions

No sooner said than done. Difficult text done: helpful and simple. Copy paste was only on the articles of the law will not replace them.
On the Internet looking for questions on the topic, I watched the responses - complement your text. The examples were replaced with: number, name, and situation.

After all the manipulations to check the quality of the text:
Editor-in-chief: purity 8.9 / 9.3 readability
etext (anti-plagiarism): the uniqueness 79% / check for rewrite 45% !!!
Turgenev: 10 points - a high level to get banned from search engines. This high score is caused by the repetition of the same words.

Question: what to do? To come up with synonyms in legal subject - so-so solution.
The text is written simply and to the point. If you remove words in the sentences lost their meaning. The replacement of the pronoun - not a good idea. Make three sentences one complex is not an option.

All the same, how can that be? Leave it as is? Now the text is perfect for a person, but with PS you can grab ban. To fill the text with water or what?

PS. I do not know the correct category of a question, more suitable is simply not found. If you know the correct category - prompt.
March 20th 20 at 11:28
4 answers
March 20th 20 at 11:30
Lyrics for of people almost never get a ban from the search engines, there's nothing to worry about
You work at yandex? On what basis such a conclusion?
I'm not interested in speculation, but facts. If You have a couple of sites, it is not enough to conclude. - Evelyn_Swift77 commented on March 20th 20 at 11:33
@Lavern_HintzYou are looking for facts in SEO? Amuse)) ask about support search engines, other spices You can hardly believe it, judging by Your comment - Dasia commented on March 20th 20 at 11:36
@Lavern_Hintz, no Facts, just statistics. Experienced SEOs just has a set of statistics and cones, which he stuffed in his career.
On this basis he builds his speculation as something to take to the top of search results.
And few professional SEOs share their secrets and their statistics. - Bridget_Bauch commented on March 20th 20 at 11:39
March 20th 20 at 11:32
Put in the forefront of people, not robots. And do for people, not for robots.

Do search engines aren't the same validation algorithms for uniqueness/rewriting as etxt (as well as Advego and text.ru). In such a text you will not have any sanctions can not be afraid.

PS still occur in the results sites created entirely copy-paste, and good collecting traf.
Put in the forefront of people, not robots. And do for people, not for robots.

worn out, uninformative phrase

What algorithms PS I don't know, so ask.
I would be glad if You backed up his words with facts.

Exceptions always exist, but whether it is necessary to focus on isolated cases? - Evelyn_Swift77 commented on March 20th 20 at 11:35
@Lavern_Hintz, here are a couple of articles on the subject, the essence of which boils down to: "do Not bother this account":
https://texterra.ru/blog/issledovanie-deystvitelno...
https://anticorporativ.ru/pro_onlajn/ne-zamorachiv...

I can advise you to use the "Original texts" in the Webmaster, but warns that the good of it will not be much.

And Yes you will arrive with Eliahou) - Annetta_Smith commented on March 20th 20 at 11:38
@Cleo, on both Your links - 404.
About the original texts - use.
Yeah, Ilakov a lot of things in the case says, though not entirely agree with him 100%. - Evelyn_Swift77 commented on March 20th 20 at 11:41
@Lavern_Hintz, here cut, here link 1here link 2. - Annetta_Smith commented on March 20th 20 at 11:44
March 20th 20 at 11:34
but with PS you can grab ban.

You have experience or just afraid of flags?

in SEO there are levels, transitions between which are achieved only with experience

knowing, for example, what Ashmanov can ignorovat Turgenev
or not to ignore

this is being addressed in evidence-based medicine
If I had experience, I wouldn't be asking.
This question arose after reading the recommendations of these services.
But services designed on solid experience, at least they say this.

Why should I ignore the service Turgenev?
Give the facts. Why should I believe You, You even offers normally can not write, snatches of conversation. - Evelyn_Swift77 commented on March 20th 20 at 11:37
Why should I believe You

so I'm not Turgenev, services not to offer ))

and why believe? the theme of something highly competitive - Alison_Hamill commented on March 20th 20 at 11:40
March 20th 20 at 11:36
You watched the results on the necessary requests for that page? Look at the top, the number of occurrences and go from there. Especially since you did a good job on the text, in your words.

PS For conscience ' sake look at the different sites from the top list according to different requests, and Turgenev would show risk.
Logical observation, but it is not so simple.
Took the first 5 sites of the issue, here is what Turgenev:
1) 2 points
2) 4 points
3) 6 points
4) 5 points
5) 4 points

All these sites are full of meaningless sentences. Almost all the proposals can be simplified without loss of meaning. Not to mention that many of the sites of the issue on legal topics do not contain relevant information for the current year. - Evelyn_Swift77 commented on March 20th 20 at 11:39
@Lavern_Hintz, which request, if not a secret? - hugh.Thiel90 commented on March 20th 20 at 11:42
@delia, how is that relevant? Take any request on legal topics, in which there are figures. Of course, there are laws that have not changed since the 90s. - Evelyn_Swift77 commented on March 20th 20 at 11:45

Find more questions by tags Search engine optimization