Read various articles on this issue, but I want to know the opinions of others. Now make saytik on freelancing, can in html5/css3/js/jquery and a little php and sql. Still want to leave in the back end(though I'm still there and not especially rummage, but like). But, on the other hand, do not want to drop front end. I'm afraid that if I web full stack, you'll be able to back'e and front e worse than the backender and frontender, respectively.
How do we know the limits of your capabilities? There are people who can be frontenders, bekederemo and Manager without compromising quality on any of the items. And there are those who even front to overpower normally incapable.
clark.Wisozk17 answered on March 23rd 20 at 18:51
Not worth it.
I myself am 12 years was web full stack and even actively defended the view that web full stack is cool, it is convenient for the customers, it is useful (even must have) to know all the components and so and so. Then I decided to leave entirely in the backend. And spusti a few years I realized that this was one of the most important and correct decisions in my life/career.
Really and objectively compare the good with pretender fullsteam, good backender with fullsteam - hard. For all your level, it's hard to find someone with whom you can realistically compare. Therefore, backed by the science of the numbers I have. But the experience and feel - fullstack will always be on the same level below the specialist. Because physically he can't give each area as much time as a specialist.
Jesus answered on March 23rd 20 at 18:53
Only you can decide. But Yes, web full stack worse than a specialist's depth of knowledge