Does the video card on performance of visual studio?

Will vary speed in VS on the laptop with integrated graphics and a laptop with integrated + discrete good?
April 3rd 20 at 17:36
4 answers
April 3rd 20 at 17:38
No, it's not.
Rendering GUI is a joke.
April 3rd 20 at 17:40
No.
The graphics card is only needed for games, although in recent years it is still active browser to use now.
But it lacks built-in.
For visual studio type video card does not matter.
The graphics card is only needed for games

And HDD or SSD is only needed for Windows? (sarcasm) The same integrated - all the same video card. - princess.Greenfelder commented on April 3rd 20 at 17:43
@princess.Greenfelder, the graphics chip has two problems - the output image on the screen, and calculation of 3D graphics.
With the output image are guaranteed to cope with any video card.
So if you do not need acceleration of calculations 3D, then go integrated.
Meaning a separate graphics card there. - walton.Shanahan commented on April 3rd 20 at 17:46
Well, Yes. Direct2D you don't know what is. - craig commented on April 3rd 20 at 17:49
April 3rd 20 at 17:42
In VS there is hardware rendering something there. In fact, I do not feel the difference, but I have a powerful computer.
Tools/Options/General > Visual Experience
here can switching to poravnati whether you have a difference.
But the speed of the drives, memory and CPU impact is stronger, I think.
April 3rd 20 at 17:44
Let's because WPF uses hardware acceleration Direct2D. But the VS monstrous mix of WPF and WinForms. With the budget/built-in video know how Direct2D. So the difference will be.

Find more questions by tags Ironvideo cardsVisual Studio