How fast Google will ban a website with 5K backlinks?

Good day!

Subject: https://alfheim.co the Website surely takes the top 3 already 5месяцев. The domain was purchased in July 2018 and exactly a year later, he began to pour backlinks. Lily generously, maybe it's DLE-posting, a La Xrumer.

5df9130a4e7d7629143218.jpeg

Typical sites that put links to:

https://fpzn.com.ar/2017/11/17/marco-a-sosa-sacif/
emmanuelmaurel.eu/2016/04/25/how-to-create-balance...

https://instrumentationwarehouse.com/world-trade-a...
https://www.sacredhealinghands.com/2015/03/20/u00a...
blackgirlscheer.com/2019/05/10/favorite-or-not
beople.es/que-uso-le-dan-las-mejores-marcas-las-re...
ceron.bplaced.net/klassenlagerle/wordpress/?p=753


Guided to fame.

5df9136c808ae670740587.jpeg

Distributed evenly to links to anchors:

5df9138944c78534383081.jpeg

And so Google's not too offended - constantly paid Google Ads.

Actually the question to the experts of the viewer: how long?

And the second question is, in principle, never banned? Buy a domain, give him prostatica 1year natiki 5K Xrumer links and cough for Google Ads and all, in not very competitive niche you're king?

p.s. Google is so freaked out and believed in their algorithms, which is similar to numerous complaints, with examples and evidence, to respond not going
April 3rd 20 at 18:25
3 answers
April 3rd 20 at 18:27
Not the fact that it palanet... have seen sites with many more links, and in less time... and they are all OK at the moment. But the exact anchor text in such numbers, and even without bezankornyh references is a risk.
It seems to me that there are areas where the same cool algorithm from Google is cracking down - but there are others, where everything is left to chance.
What I describe is not very competitive niche. And, perhaps, the one who this whole thing was doing, yet knew what they were doing. Do not hang any references to the domain under year, then began shamelessly hrenachit But! along the way ordered the same Google Adwords... Like where's the traffic? Knows how - with a super "relevant" Google EMF )))

Another point, the site owner and his raskrutki - don't even bother to fill the website with suitable content/Koh-tion of text on the subject.

When the backlinks were put on 1K a month - I watched the results in a day, the site was just secured to the ceiling above the wretched Yelp-a and Facebook. - Rozella.Lueilwitz commented on April 3rd 20 at 18:30
I think the traffic there is nothing to do...
It is possible that Google EMF was specially commissioned to ensure that the site is "normal and commercial." According to the principle "once it is paid, there is not junk"... - Amie_Wals commented on April 3rd 20 at 18:33
@Amie_Wals, you slightly contradict yourself... Google EMF's order for what? To go to the website - what's that?

Traffic. As if Google was not treated ordering AdWords, it is still somewhat of a distraction. Although if the smart guys from Google gash clever algorithm, what are the questions measure up to anchor and measure where are they? And they are not closed for comments sites forgotten all SEOs except that there're getting hammered for 7K of comments putting those same anchors and "drowning" competitors, placing the anchors about child porn. In General, all the fun, as you can.

And if Google Panda smart crap, then she's just not aimed at specific niches, countries, cities or it's not smart crap - Rozella.Lueilwitz commented on April 3rd 20 at 18:36
@Amie_Wals,
According to the principle "once it is paid, there is not junk"...


This too is a denial of discharge observations - when govnosayt constantly being pushed into AdWords and money really do not regret (and I see it as 2years), but Google is generally not a signal "that it's not garbage", the site is just dull G. the owner of the site none reported relevant landing with the entry key in the URL Right nausea of the text. And in the end that Xrumer for 350баксов can put 7K links over 3months that other "clever" will manage in 7K bucks, because they "trust" resources.

The bottom line, not a "garbage" site prosiraet on normal AdWords a lot of money in the TOP10, he did not. So ... this is sort of a signal. - Rozella.Lueilwitz commented on April 3rd 20 at 18:39
I see no contradictions.

About the cleverness of any of the algorithms... they think each factor/signal is assigned some weight or percentage. If the estimated weight of the negative signals outweigh the weight is positive and reaches a preset threshold, the trigger occurs and the site is marked as a candidate in the ban. - Amie_Wals commented on April 3rd 20 at 18:42
@Amie_Wals, I agree...Yes, but there's a problem. The top sites with 7K links and 45 links ;) Or they have the same number of transitions, or the presence of trash 7K links is still insufficient negative signal for the smart algorithm) - Rozella.Lueilwitz commented on April 3rd 20 at 18:45
@Amie_Wals,
It is possible that Google EMF was specially commissioned to ensure that the site is "normal and commercial."


Perhaps because I wrote she's ordered to hide the growth of a site in the results due to the explosive growth of backlinks ? ;)

Because by your logic,everyone who ordered AdWords thus branded the site as seryozny? - Rozella.Lueilwitz commented on April 3rd 20 at 18:48
@Rozella.Lueilwitz, it's not my logic, I just suspect that for Google this is a signal to plus site.
And I think that for them, loot is much more important than right and fair algorithm.
Something like "we understand that he is an sob but he's OUR son of a bitch" :) - Amie_Wals commented on April 3rd 20 at 18:51
@Amie_Wals,
And I think that for them, loot is much more important than right and fair algorithm.


You are absolutely right. So here ordering them "relevant" advertising is a signal of "we are loyal to you." Though not having 7K backlinks and disabling the is - is 7страница in the results.

Somehow one of the older dudes Google led a seminar at one of the universities of the United States, where he combed over the "new and smart" system for the sale of airtime on radio in the States. Google bought wholesale and then pushed at retail, while not forgetting develop accou logic to set the price. When the second hour of a debate, with students who saw the lack of logic and cheat the price, the speaker finally gave out "it's not about expediency and profit" - the people finally breathed out and understood correctly Google. ))

p.s. and here would appreciate an honest banner from Google "we will show your ad (plastic Windows Moscow to buy) in Karaganda, Mongolia and Madagascar. And Yes, we don't care that you disagree. On your 1000$ we'll bring you 10 clients and you somehow beat this thing bucks. We developed this system and we will parasitize and objectivity YOU. :)
And not to be known as moral monsters - we came up with stories about cool algorithms, which are simply created to show relevant query response.
The truth is we need every year to change and complicate and rewrite the algorithm "honest" Google Ads...

This will have only one, the less the user knows the logic of Google, the more money the user will give the Google ;) And about the area too. Someone launched a fake, the sites on the servers of Google more trust. And someone earns backlinked with Forbes at$ 150 for gobnascale.
Google produces a ton of fakes to hide your stupid monetization in the style of "I'm the boss and you are a fool and you pay for it" ;) - Rozella.Lueilwitz commented on April 3rd 20 at 18:54
@Rozella.Lueilwitz,
Bravo, Alexander! Very interesting infa and the right conclusions! :)
I no longer believe the statements of the representatives of the search engines.
All you need to check the tests. In SEO without this in any way. And this is one of the main ways to find valuable information. Another - the study of the interesting situations found in the top. - Amie_Wals commented on April 3rd 20 at 18:57
April 3rd 20 at 18:29
at the bottom of the other algorithms, links from the left quite working
On this resource as Habr - you can reveal a little more secrets about the "other" algorithms, even without hints. Of course, if you think fit ;) - Rozella.Lueilwitz commented on April 3rd 20 at 18:32
yeah, especially about growing without links )) - Penelope.Kris commented on April 3rd 20 at 18:35
@Penelope.Kris, mg.. your super style "do not say anything but ohmynews" - appreciated. - Rozella.Lueilwitz commented on April 3rd 20 at 18:38
April 3rd 20 at 18:31
Regular black SEO, these sites a million, can't complain
Google to manually consider each such complaint have billions to spend annually
nothing to complain about


- to complain there is something, but to no avail

Google to manually consider each such complaint have billions to spend annually


- generally don't care spending Google
- the trick here is that nefig to declare the RULES of conduct, if they can systematically violate and not get banned
- grain and comb for their Panda algorithms - Rozella.Lueilwitz commented on April 3rd 20 at 18:34
@Rozella.Lueilwitzwhich laws are violated?
Well, Google is a business and care about him for his loot
It's not hard really and the recommendations for webmasters, if everyone did these rules of SEO would not be, well, rules that out of nowhere appeared

Again a regular black SEO, all looking for loopholes to get traffic and earn money, black SEOs personally rich and such foolishness as you are maeotsa - Lupe.Corkery commented on April 3rd 20 at 18:37
@Lupe.Corkery, I love your style - in fact nothing to say, but the man with a beret and writes evidence.

Well, Google is a business and care about him for his loot


you read homeeee? I had written that I do not care to waste Google,
but thank you for skillfully clarified the fact that Google is a business) - Rozella.Lueilwitz commented on April 3rd 20 at 18:40
@Rozella.Lueilwitz, and he do not care for you so support will not be - Lupe.Corkery commented on April 3rd 20 at 18:43
@Lupe.Corkery, Dog-Voronezh, hare already talking garbage, especially when you didn't ask.. - Rozella.Lueilwitz commented on April 3rd 20 at 18:46

Find more questions by tags GoogleSearch engine optimization