Which Defragmenter is the best?

Which defragger is the best and why.
Now I use O&O Defrag and Smart Defrag. Both work about the same, at last a nice design :)
April 4th 20 at 12:59
4 answers
April 4th 20 at 13:01
For Windows, starting with WinXP, the best is its own built-in Defragmenter. The need for any third-party prog long ago disappeared.
I will not accept. Sometimes it makes sense to Defrag the disk files by name or date modified. For example, archive disks, where data is only written to but not deleted. Regular defragmentation this can not only unites the fragments of files and, AFAIK, no defragment free space - that is, the pieces of free space again clogged with lumps of new files very, very quickly. - Cali_Farrell commented on April 4th 20 at 13:04
@Cali_Farrell, the Meaning of Defrag - to accelerate the performance of faluji to get her head pulled when reading the file. The speed of the archive drive imho is not important at all, is now a model of "archival storage" is back to the speed of 5400 rpm... - Emerson.Kuhn commented on April 4th 20 at 13:07
@Emerson.Kuhn, Oh why, is important to me, for example. And occupied by solid data the first half of the disc is greatly hampered by the FS shit in there scraps of files and then want to defragment. - Cali_Farrell commented on April 4th 20 at 13:10
April 4th 20 at 13:03
Built-in Optimize drives.
The rest vaanofdalmasca not needed.
April 4th 20 at 13:05
And what criteria determine the quality of a SOFTWARE?
Apparently, nice design. - rebecca.Abernathy commented on April 4th 20 at 13:08
April 4th 20 at 13:07
go for the SSD there the Defragmenter is not needed

Find more questions by tags Hard disksWindowsDefragmentation