Can there be inflation gigabytes?

By 2030, Japan's plan to fully implement the 6g,that means the same 15 GB for which you pay 400-500 rubles,you can lose a couple of minutes.Turns at Internet speed,you will need to increase the volume of available limit(well, the nl will be super expensive).So? Or still will be people who will survive for 3 GB?
April 4th 20 at 13:17
6 answers
April 4th 20 at 13:19
the traffic does not grow linearly with increasing channel width.

video length of 30 minutes and a volume of 1Gb downloaded per hour or per second still has a capacity of 1Gb and the view takes 30 minutes.
The video has more resolution) - marta_Donnelly commented on April 4th 20 at 13:22
The wider the channel, priveredlivie its owners.
Oh, a soap Opera, will download just in case, then I will look. Downloaded five seasons, watched the pilot and deleted nafig all seasons, not much. - jaquelin41 commented on April 4th 20 at 13:25
@marta_Donnelly, 4K online, don't look - zella_Bauch commented on April 4th 20 at 13:28
@jaquelin41, after the appearance of online services, you often are downloading something with trekkers? - zella_Bauch commented on April 4th 20 at 13:31
@zella_Bauch, by the way, Yes. swing has become a lot less =)
But I'm speaking figuratively. do not have TV shows to download. - jaquelin41 commented on April 4th 20 at 13:34
@zella_Bauch,
after the appearance of online services, you often are downloading something with trekkers?

Personally, no, because in the online services in Russia is rare to find a video with the original track, not to mention the fact that the range are different, and to subscribe to all - no the salary is not enough.
However, I believe that the number of users of torrents originally is not so high. - merlin_Blanda41 commented on April 4th 20 at 13:37
April 4th 20 at 13:21
what can I say. I paid for Internet and per minute and per megabyte. And for the width of the channel.
Who knows maybe the scheme of monetization quite change.
For example, enter an individual user ID and pay
only have the right of access to the network from any device and pay content services part of the cost
will be a tax on traffic .

And like the time I was already in my life with the wired providers. When the limit of the paid traffic I could choose during the day.
April 4th 20 at 13:23
Or still will be people who will survive for 3 GB
At home I optics 200мегабит/s in Gigabit local network provider.

I also work well with cottages where very bad reception and 3g speed 1мегабит/s is cool.

Just properly expose the priorities of the traffic and do not swing the extra.
On the wireless Internet typically high speed is not necessary, if only the link was.

In some cases, enough 100бит/s - though there is not about the Internet it.
April 4th 20 at 13:25
By 2030, Japan plan

Already have a formal plan, standard, laws and contracts with operators and builders?
plan to introduce 6g

You know what's a 6G? Or just read somewhere...
you can lose a couple of minutes

You have the wrong calculations. If you think so, then the same 15 GB today should we spend for one hour.
you will need to increase the volume of available limit

This is a virtual value, as your ranking on the toaster. It has nothing to do with the real world and is determined exclusively by the pricing policy of the company depending on market situation.
Or still will be people who will survive for 3 GB?

Not all people need the Internet, even the 3 GB.
April 4th 20 at 13:27
And why "lost GB" it will increase? The opening page, etc. in fact, the same size remain.
The opening page, etc. in fact, the same size remain.

In the early and even mid 2000хх the average page of the site was a maximum of a few tens of kilobytes, well, maybe a couple of hundred pounds. But now what? There are pages, goofy, and weigh hundreds of Megabytes! Not to mention about the video. Where our 3gp funny size? And where is 4k video, stereo? Many times the difference. - Adell_Hayes commented on April 4th 20 at 13:30
April 4th 20 at 13:29
Can. Will. It is inevitable. Something previously thought impossible, or simply unnecessary - are now in order. For example, in the early 2000s if someone asked whether it is possible online movie download? When channels dial-up and rates $ 100/5MB or 1 hour of Internet (there were different, and traffic and time) - I generally respond "you can, but to swing you a week, and splurge on the Internet." Further, the films on the disks were in mpeg4, and the size 700MB, just to be on the disc got. Yes, and the larger size was, but it was more difficult to obtain, and more expensive - if on DVD you can record from a bunch of movies in small size and 15" monitor, they are quite looked, the more resolution/quality fullscreen disk, and on small monitors was not a particularly noticeable difference.
Then I went HD, FullHD, stereo ... and then the films (nearly 2 times larger). With the increase in channels and methods of use can (and should) change. If before that on every computer you can find a collection of pictures (!), clips and all sorts of vidyushku, now anybody and in a head will not come to this store - what if you could quickly and easily is to find and watch directly online? And now, many homes on the disks are the films in good quality and size in the tens of gigs, because the channel will not allow to watch this online from the same quality. But if the delay will be even less, and the speed of 10Gbit/s are commonplace? - I am not going to practically save the movies, and the disks used only for backups or any other of their important data.
You can still cause a bunch of examples, but then you really think.

Find more questions by tags TelephonyComputer networksMobile communication