Why torrents are put on the Internet?

I then try torrents. I used to use, and then decided to see.

Question: why, if you enable torrents, the rest of the Internet falls to almost zero?
In the browser the damn thing is not loaded. I would understand if it just slowed, and it says "website not found".
Voice communication also falls. It's not the quality of the sags and even the Internet can't see!

Moreover, it occurs even when I hard cut the torrents channel. The band put in 10-20 times less than its actual channel. A limit on the number of ports also put in several times smaller than the default values. All to no avail: with torrents nifiga does not work, and have to kill qBittorrent - instantly comes to life. Only very late at night, when apparently all gone to bed, the usual Internet could weakly, but somehow to break through the torrent.

Is this normal at all?
April 19th 20 at 12:37
8 answers
April 19th 20 at 12:39
Linux? If Linux run, this miserable network subsystem is to blame, the recommendation is to upgrade to Windows.
joke of the day. - berneice commented on April 19th 20 at 12:42
@berneice, if. Experienced personally that when you run the torrent client network hangs tightly. - cole_Gaylo commented on April 19th 20 at 12:45
@cole_Gaylohave experienced personally that when you run a torrent client the network is well behaved. with it regardless of the axis.

extrapolating your unfortunate experience all around - it's not so much cute, how limited horizons. - berneice commented on April 19th 20 at 12:48
Ahahahaha!!! miserable network subsystem of the Knicks :))))))))))))))
Excellent trolling :) - isabel43 commented on April 19th 20 at 12:51
@isabel43, alas, is not trolling. - berneice commented on April 19th 20 at 12:54
@isabel43,
Ahahahaha!!! miserable network subsystem of the Knicks :))))))))))))))

She's not always miserable, to be fair. Sometimes it doesn't work at all (as is the case with WiFi) and then wretched to be just nothing.

@berneice,
extrapolating your unfortunate experience all around

"Personally encountered" is not "experienced in person". - cole_Gaylo commented on April 19th 20 at 12:57
@cole_Gaylo, my Friend,
I read your "its simple functi souls" about how bad you were under Linux and as well became under the wind, and even largely agree.
Few drivers, not all printer are supported, with scanners in General, all sad, GUI "glued" askew, awry, etc, etc...
But about the network subsystem, please, don't say anything, not yet done anything on the sockets for both axis.
Ask what version of winows appeared WSAPoll.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api...
When nikah ip is already running in Win3.1 it only appeared crooked sewn with the edge.
The fact that you couldn't administrirovanie your system does not mean that it is bad.
Let's use the axis on the right places.
For example right now I'm writing this post from the laptop under Windows. OK-the rules! She was in the right place!
But the server I on Linux! He was there in his place.
As people worked under QNX, FreeBSD, RT-11, DEMOS, CP-M, and so on. I can say that every axle is good for your tasks. - isabel43 commented on April 19th 20 at 13:00
@isabel43, Sully. Windows location on the desktop, Linux on server. - cole_Gaylo commented on April 19th 20 at 13:03
@cole_Gaylo, as well.
in this case, one head live well "miserable network subsystem" and "Linux servers". - berneice commented on April 19th 20 at 13:06
@berneice, nuoc, I incorrectly expressed. I meant "wretched network subsystem for the desktop", you win. - cole_Gaylo commented on April 19th 20 at 13:09
@cole_Gaylo, I have some VERY bad news. The subsystem is the same. - anjali_Feil commented on April 19th 20 at 13:12
@cole_Gaylo, I have to monitor the fat drip. - Kyle_Gutma commented on April 19th 20 at 13:15
April 19th 20 at 12:41
no it's not normal.
the reasons can be many. for example, written on the package the router/modem/network card and 100500 other.
I think the author dead channel first. Although in modern times it sounds strange. - hank_Schamberger commented on April 19th 20 at 12:44
April 19th 20 at 12:43
The shaper works with your ISP for the torrent traffic.
99% of!
I would have thought so too, but a VPN (P2P and they have officially allowed). - Lane91 commented on April 19th 20 at 12:46
@Lane91, and no they are not banned! ) - Alanis commented on April 19th 20 at 12:49
April 19th 20 at 12:45
The router can have fun. My old, inherited, as well behaved. Try directly connecting the cable to the computer.
April 19th 20 at 12:47
Possible causes:
The number of simultaneously open sockets is suitable to the operating system limitation.
A bad channel.
Bad router.
Bad karma.
April 19th 20 at 12:49
if you enable torrents, the rest of the Internet falls to almost zero
Torrent is multiple data transmission.
Regular download - single flow pumps with a single host. In the case of the torrent open a lot of network connections.

Your router may stupidly not withstand the load. And that's all.
Especially if you limit the bandwidth router and so cannot cope with the work, because he still rules shaping process is necessary.

May be the problem is not the router, and bad channel - if the channel is clogged with packages torrent other will not pass.
April 19th 20 at 12:51
Because the descriptions are not complete, maybe (we must not forget that torrent is not only the downloading but also the distribution) you have not configured the hand, which is occupying the entire channel, other programs, literally, to even utter a word (to query DNS for example).
April 19th 20 at 12:53
Wang. The problem with the router. He is not pulling the load. Just to check. Cut Torr at the maximum, and from the other device to try poetrythe page in bruiser
If it doesn'T - blame the router. If will work, albeit slowly, the problem with setevogo on PC

Find more questions by tags BitTorrentComputer networks